Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 35988 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised.
2. Heard Sri Ajitam Srivastava, Advocate holding brief of Sri Nirbhay Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.436 of 2026, under Sections 87, 137(2) B.N.S., Police Station Sikandrarau, District Hathras, during the pendency of trial.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by
learned counsel for the parties, and the evidence on record, and taking into
consideration the fact that the victim has not whispered a single word against the applicant and that, as per her statement recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S., she left the house in anguish and travelled on her own, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
5. Let the applicant- Kaley Yadav @ Manmohan, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 8, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nirbhay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
(Krishan Pahal,J.) Kaley Yadav @ Manmohan .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad