Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1580 (HP)

DIKSHA DEVI v. PRAMOD KUMAR

CMPMO/753/2025 · 2026-04-01

Virender Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:9666 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.   :      753 of 2025 Decided on      : 1 st   April, 2026 Diksha Devi …Petitioner Versus Pramod Kumar …Respondent Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner       :  Mr. Mohar Singh, Advocate. For the respondent    : None. Virender Singh, Judge (Oral) On 18.03.2026, in pursuance of the notices issued by   this   Court,   Shri   B.R.   Sharma,   Advocate,   has   put appearance on behalf of the respondent, by filing memo of appearance. On that day, the parties were directed to remain present, before this Court, today, on 01.04.2026. 2. Today,   neither   respondent,   nor   his   counsel   has bothered   to   put   appearance   before   this   Court. In   such 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. 2 2026:HHC:9666 situation, further wait is not justifiable. As such, the present petition is being decided. 3. Petitioner–Diksha   Devi   has   approached   this Court, by way of the present petition, under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CPC’), seeking   transfer   of   HMA   Petition   No.18   of   2025,   titled   as Pramod   Kumar   versus   Diksha   Devi,   instituted   by   the respondent­husband   before  the  Court  of  learned   Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Solan, District Solan, H.P. 4. According to the petitioner­wife, she was married to respondent­husband, on 23.10.2014. After the marriage, she has started residing with the respondent­husband and out of the said wedlock and the parties to the lis have been blessed with child namely Suryansh. 5. According   to   the   petitioner­wife,   thereafter,   she had   filed  the  petition   for  divorce,   under   Section   13   of   the Hindu   Marriage   Act   (hereinafter   referred   to   as   ‘the   Act’), 3 2026:HHC:9666 before the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Solan. 6. Subsequently, respondent­husband  filed petition, under Section 9 of the Act, bearing HMA Petition No.18 of 2025, before the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur. 7. According   to   the   petitioner,   she   has   filed   the divorce petition, prior in time and as a counter blast thereto the respondent­husband has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Act. 8. On the basis of the above facts, a prayer has been made to allow the petition. 9. Along with the present petition, the petitioner­wife has   annexed   the   photocopy   of   the   petition,   filed   by   the respondent­husband,   under   Section   9   of   the   Act. Today, despite directions of this Court, neither respondent­husband, nor, his counsel has bothered to put appearance before this Court to controvert the allegations, which have been levelled in   the   transfer   application. Meaning   thereby,   whatsoever asserted by the petitioner­wife, which is duly supported by the 4 2026:HHC:9666 affidavit,   has   not   been   controverted   by   the   respondent­ husband. 10. Considering the fact that the convenience of the wife   is   paramount   consideration,   in   such   type   of   matters, coupled   with   the   fact   that   whatsoever   pleaded   by   the petitioner­wife, in the petition, remained uncontroverted,  this Court is of the view that the present petition is liable to be allowed. 11. Consequently, the petition is allowed and the case bearing  HMA   Petition   No.18   of   2025,   titled   as  Pramod Kumar versus Diksha Devi, pending adjudication before the Court of learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur is transferred to the Court of learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Solan, District Solan, H.P. 12. Learned   Principal   Judge,   Family   Court,   Solan, District   Solan,   H.P.,   is   requested   to   proceed   further,   after securing the presence of both the parties. 13. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 5 2026:HHC:9666 14. A copy of this order be sent to the Court of learned Additional   Principal   Judge,   Family   Court,   Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, as well as, to the Court of learned Principal Judge,   Family   Court,   Solan,   District   Solan,   H.P.,   for compliance. ( Virender Singh ) April 01, 2026( ps ) Judge