Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15798 (GAU)

AJMOT ALI AND ANR. v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3171/2026 · 2026-10-05

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010221142026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3171/2026 AJMOT ALI AND ANR. S/O KASHEM ALI, VILL.- BADHAKARA, P.S.- BAGINADI, DIST.- LAKHIMPUR 2: UMED ALI S/O ABDUL RAHMAN VILL.- BADHAKARA P.S.- BAGINADI DIST. - LAKHIMPU VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S DEVI, MS. K L R YANTHAN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 06.10.2026 Heard Ms. S Devi, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Bhaskar Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/2 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, whereby the petitioners, namely, 1. Ajmot Ali and 2. Umed Ali have prayed for releasing them on bail as they are facing trial in Special (N) Case No.38/2026 registered under Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the NDPS Act pending in the Court of the learned Special Judge, Darrang, Mangaldai. 3. The case aforementioned is now posted for framing charges. 4. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsel of both sides. 5. Commercial quantity of narcotic drugs is involved in this case. Therefore, let the trial court examine at least 3 (three) prosecution witnesses. After that, the petitioners shall have the liberty to approach this Court again for seeking bail. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the bail application stands closed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant