HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34942 of 2026 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Ved Prakash Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Mohit Yadav, learned A.G.A. for the State, Sri Ankit Shukla, learned counsel for the informant in the predicate offence and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.259 of 2026, under sections 2(b)(xi), 3 of U.P. Gangster Act, Police Station- Baghpat, District Baghpat, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of two criminal cases shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal cases have been mentioned in the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. Learned counsel has further stated that there is a criminal history of two cases against the applicant, which has been explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 21.5.2026. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the informant in the predicate offence has also opposed the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Kumar Tripathi, Ved Prakash Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhinav Gaur, Ankit Shukla, G.A., Mohd. Rashid Siddiqui, Shreya Trivedi Anand .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) prayer for bail and stated that the bail order passed in the predicate offence has been challenged before the Supreme Court and the matter has been fixed for 9.10.2026. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima-facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant- Anand, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 8. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. October 8, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 34942 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad