HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED, CENTRAL BRANCH v. ROSHAN VERMA
CRMP/526/2025 · 2026-01-21
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15786 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15786 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:3844
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 526 of 2025 1 - Hindustan Unilever Limited, Central Branch Through Its Legal Consultant, 1st Floor, Titanium Tower, Shalimar Park, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow- 226010 (U.P.) 2 - Regional Manager Hindustan Unilever Limited, Kolkata, Regional Office Brook House 9, Shakespeare Sarani, Kolkata, 700071
... Petitioners versus 1 - Roshan Verma Food Safety Officer, Food And Drug Administration, District Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner Of Food Safety Food And Drug Administration, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Food Safety Officer, Food And Drug Administration, District Bemetara (C.G.)
---- Non-applicant For Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Ms. Vaishali Mahilong, Dy. Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board 22.01.2026
1. The applicant has filed this instant revision petition with the following prayer:
“ It is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble High Court may kindly be pleased - (I) to call for records of Complaint Case No. 810/2019 (Roshan Verma Vs Shri Rajesh Jain & others) from the Court of learned JMFC Bemetara. (II) to allow the petition thereby setting aside the impugned
order dated 22.10.2024 & 20.12.2024 (Annexure A/1) passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class (Presiding Officer Shri M. Jahangeer Tigala), Bemetara (C.G.) in Complaint Case No. 810/2019 Roshan Verma Vs RAJSHEKHAR SONI Digitally signed by RAJSHEKHAR SONI
2 Rajesh Jain & others as also the entire proceedings as well as sanction order dated 23.05.2019 (Annexure A/4), in the interest of justice. (III) To declare that issuance of process is unsustainable before taking cognizance of offence. (IV) to grant any other relief deemed fit and proper in the
facts and circumstances of the case. ”
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this instant petition, with liberty to the petitioners to approach to the trial Court.
3. Learned State counsel has no objection.
4. Permission is granted.
5. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to approach to the trial Court.
6. Let a certified copy of this order as well as the original records, be transmitted to the concerned trial Court for necessary compliance and follow up action, if any.
Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice Rajshekhar