IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH The Gurdaspur Jail Road Cooperative Labour and Construction another State of Punjab and CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE M Present : Mr. Shiv Kumar Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab DEEPAK SIBAL, J 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner be satisfied if the present writ No.2 to decide in a time bound manner the first appeal filed by the petitioners to challenge therein the r Gurdaspur. 2. Learned to the acceptance of the 3. The afore alternate prayer made on the peti reasonable. Delay in decision of the pe violating the petitioners’ right under learned State counsel has also petition is disposed of with a the petitioners’ aforesaid appeal within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order but only after affording an opportunity of hearing to all affected parties and in accordance with law 19.03.2026 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable Sr. No. 193 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH The Gurdaspur Jail Road Cooperative Labour and Construction Versus and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Shiv Kumar, Advocate, for the petitioner Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab * * * * * DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at this stage, be satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of with to decide in a time bound manner the first appeal filed by the petitioners to challenge therein the redraw conducted on 03.03.2026 by Learned State counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection acceptance of the afore alternate prayer made on the petitioners’ behalf. he afore alternate prayer made on the peti elay in decision of the petitioners’ aforesaid appeal would lating the petitioners’ right under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India learned State counsel has also no objection to its acceptance. Therefore petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the petitioners’ aforesaid appeal within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order but only after affording an opportunity of hearing to all affected parties and in accordance with law. (DEEPAK SIBAL (LAPITA BANERJI Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-8455-2026 Date of decision : 19.03.2026 The Gurdaspur Jail Road Cooperative Labour and Construction Society Limited and .… Petitioners ..... Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL LAPITA BANERJI petitioners. Mr. R.S.Pandher, Additional A.G., Punjab. submits that at this stage, he would petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent to decide in a time bound manner the first appeal filed by the petitioners to edraw conducted on 03.03.2026 by District Tender Committee, counsel, who appears on advance notice, has no objection afore alternate prayer made on the petitioners’ behalf. he afore alternate prayer made on the petitioners’ behalf is found to be titioners’ aforesaid appeal would also result in Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The to its acceptance. Therefore, the present direction to respondent No.2 to take a final decision on the petitioners’ aforesaid appeal within 10 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order but only after affording an opportunity of hearing to all affected parties and DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2026.03.24 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document