Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15780 (JHR)

SURAJ TANDI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4234/2026 · 2026-06-08

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

{2026:JHHC:16336} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4234 of 2026 ------ Suraj Tandi, aged about 20 years, Son of Narayan Tandi, Resident of Kadma, Bhatiya Basti, Shiv Path, House No. 40, P.O. & P.S.- Kadma, District- East Singhbhum. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Yashvardhan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Arup Kr. Dey, A.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-08-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 308(4), 308(5), 109, 351(2), 61(2), 111, 3(5) of the B.N.S., and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner files the supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner being the member of an organized gang of criminals led by Prince Khan, fired bullet upon the B.B.D. Fuel Petrol Pump of the informant for creating panic and for payment of levy to Prince Khan. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that no injury has been caused to anyone by the alleged firing and the co-accused person has been granted bail in B.A. No. 1947 of 2026 vide order dated 20.03.2026. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that petitioner has been in custody since 21.11.2025 as mentioned in para-01 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-VII, Dhanbad in connection with Rajganj P.S. Case No. 80 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 08/06/2026 Amar/