MOHD AFTAB v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER HOME DEPTT AND ORS
WP(C)/1889/2026 · 2026-06-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1578 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1578 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 1889/2026
Mohd. Aftab
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Zeeshan Arshad, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 29.06.2026
After arguing for a while, when confronted with the prayer made in the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file fresh petition. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition, along with connected application(s), is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 29.06.2026 Mihul
Sr. No. 16