RANJEET KUMAR DAS ALIAS RANJEET KR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./2707/2026 · 2026-06-08
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15779 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15779 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:16330 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 2707 of 2026
------ Ranjeet Kumar Das @ Ranjeet Kr. Das, aged about 28 years, son of Ramchandra Das, resident of Village Bagridih, P.O. Bagro, P.S. Domchanch, District Koderma, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Smt. Sunita Devi, aged about 25 years, daughter of Sri Raju Das, resident of Village Bagridih, P.O. Bagro, P.S. Domchanch, District Koderma, Jharkhand, presently residing at Village Garaidih, P.O. Pathaldiha, P.S. Koderma, District Koderma, Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Parties
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Sahil, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Shweta Singh, A.P.P. For the Complainant : Mr. Diwakar Jha, Advocate
------
02/08.06.2026 Learned counsel, Mr. Diwakar Jha submits that he is in receipt of the Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant but he has not been able to file the same in the Registry as the matter is on Board.
In view of his submission, Vakalatnama is taken on record.
The matter relates to Complaint Case No. 2395 of 2025 pending in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
2. On query made by the court, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly submits that non-bailable warrant has not been issued against the petitioner.
3. In view of the submission, it transpires that there is no apprehension as in the complaint case, custodial interrogation is not required.
4. In that view of the matter, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to move before the learned court by way of filing proper petition.
5.
Learned counsel appearing for the State and the informant have got no objection.
6. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 09.06.2026