1 2026:CGHC:3877 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 514 of 2020 1 - Motilal Since Dead Through Lrs As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 09-09- 2025 1A - Rudra Kumar Kashyap S/o Late Motilal Kahsyap Aged About 37 Years R/o Karhaiyapara, Tehsil Ratanpur, Kota, Bilaspur , District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin -495442 1B - Hirendra Kumar Kashayap S/o Late Motilal Kahsyap Aged About 32 Years R/o Karhaiyapara, Tehsil Ratanpur, Kota, Bilaspur , District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Pin -495442 ... Applicants versus 1 - Shri Ramchandra Mandir Ratanpur, No-17, Tahsil Kota, Savarkar Through Narmada Prasad, Since Dead (As Per Court Order Dated 08-01-2026) Through Lr's- 1A - Padmkant Joshi S/o Late Narmada Prasad Aged About 70 Years R/o Ward No. 6, Shri Ramchandra Mandir, Ratanpur, Tahsil Kota, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 495442 1B - Ravindrakant Joshi S/o Late Narmada Prasad Aged About 65 Years R/o Ward No. 6, Shri Ramchandra Mandir, Ratanpur, Tahsil Kota, Bilaspur, Distt. Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, Pin 495442 2 - Basant Kumar S/o Lakhanlal Sahvasi Village Ratanpur, Tahsil Kota Savarkar, Shri Ramchandra Mandir, Ratanpur, Tehsil Kota District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Non-applicants NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Digitally signed by NARESH KUMAR KAMDE Date: 2026.01.22 17:50:27 +0530 2 For Applicant(s) 1A and 1B : Shri Vijay K. Deshmukh, Advocate appears along with Ms. Tejaswi Mandawi, counsel for legal representatives of sole applicant-Motilal. For Non-applicants No.1A, 1B and 2 : Shri Saurav Gupta, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Sourabh Sharma, counsel for legal representatives of deceased Sarvarakar- Non-applicant No.1-Narmada Prasad and also Non-applicant No.2. For the State/Non-applicant No.3 : Shri Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Dy. Govt. Advocate. SB: Hon'ble Shri Justic e Sanjay S. Agrawal Order on Board 22/01/2026 1. Heard on admission. 2. This petition has been filed for restoration of Second Appeal No.237/2006, which was dismissed for want of prosecution, vide order dated 29/07/2019. 3. On due consideration and for the reasons assigned in the application for restoration of the said appeal, I am inclined to allow the same. 4. Accordingly, the instant M.C.C. is allowed and the appeal, being Second Appeal No.237/2006, is directed to be restored to its original number. 5. No order as to cost. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE Kamde