11.03.2026 Court No.13 Item No. 1 sp CPAN 170 of 2025 With WP.CT 384 of 2013 Bibek Ranjan Roy Vs. Ms. Rachna Shah, The Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension, Department of Personnel and Training, Government of India and Ors. Mr. Debajyoti Basu, ld. Sr. Adv. Mr. Barun Chatterjee. …. For the petitioner/applicant. Mr. Dhiraj Trivedi, ld. D.S.G., Mr. Amajit Dey, ld. Special P.P., CBI Mr. Rajesh Kumar Shah. …for the alleged contemnors. 1. This Court has considered the affidavit of compliance filed by the alleged contemnors, the exception taken by the petitioner/applicant thereto and the reply of the alleged contemnors. 2. The bone of contention raised by the learned Senior Counsel Mr. Debajyoti Basu for the petitioner/applicant is that his client was entitled to Modified Assured Career Progress (MACP) but has been wrongly denied the same. He also claims interest for delayed payment of terminal dues. 3. This Court is of the view that since the respondents have considered and then declined the petitioner’s entitlement to MACP, there is substantial compliance of this Court’s order and that of the Tribunal. The entitlement of MACP and interest on delayed payment of retirement benefits are left open to the petitioner/applicant to agitate in an independent proceeding before an appropriate forum in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in CPAN 170 of 2025. Hence, CPAN 170 of 2025 shall stand disposed of. 5. Consequently, all connected pending applications shall also stand disposed of. 6. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged. 7. Personal presence of the alleged contemnors is dispensed with. 8. There shall be no order as to costs. 9. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.) (Biswaroop Chowdhury, J.) 2