Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15764 (GAU)

JYOTIRMOY BARMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3111/2026 · 2026-10-04

Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010220782026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3111/2026 JYOTIRMOY BARMAN S/O- ASWINI KUMAR BARMAN, R/O-HOUSE NO. 12, JANAPATH, KHANAPARA P.S.- DISPUR DIST KAMRUPM, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. J JAKARIA,MR. MD IMDAD,MD IMRAN,MD R ISLAM,MS F HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 05.10.2026 Heard Mr. S. M. Abdullah, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. A. Begum, the learned APP for the State. 2. By this application, the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Basistha P.S. Case No. 317 of 2026, registered under Section 296(a) 118, 324 Page No.# 2/3 (4) (5), 109 (1), 351 (3), as well as 3(5) of BNS, 2023. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 19-08-2026, was lodged by the victim himself stating inter alia that, while he was going towards a cafe, the petitioner, along with others approached him in a group and assaulted him. 3. It was also alleged that, the petitioner along with another assaulted the victim with a steel iron chair on his head and body. The informant also stated that, he had sustained injuries on his head and other parts of the body and had also suffered a fracture on his right hand. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner has been inside the jail for the last 48 days and only on the grounds of prolonged incarceration, this Court may release him on bail. 4. On the other hand, Ms. A. Begum learned APP for the State, submits that, clear allegation is made against the petitioner who was stated to have assaulted the victim along with others, as a result of which, the victim sustained various injuries and as such, she submits that, the case diary be called for. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, more so in view of the fact, that the petitioner is a student and is of 21 years of age and he has also been inside the jail for the last 48 days, this Court enlarges the petitioner on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) only with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the C.J.M, Kamrup (M) under the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall positively appear before the I.O. and the Trial Court as and when call for. (ii) The petitioners shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence Page No.# 3/3 of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the case; and (iii) The petitioners shall not leave their residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer. 6. The Bail Applications stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant