SAHINA v. STATE OF HARYANA, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY
CWP/4815/2026 · 2026-04-07
Jagmohan Bansal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15763 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15763 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
**** 123
CWP-4815-2026 Date of Decision: 07.04.2026
SAHINA
...Petitioner Vs.
STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.
…Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present:- Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate with Ms. Manisha Mashaal, Advocate for the petitioner
Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana
(assisted by Mr. Ravi Kumar, Naib Tehsildar, Ferozepur Thirka)
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1.
The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to correct and rectify the name of petitioner’s village.
2.
Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that grievance of the petitioner stands redressed.
3.
Disposed of
4.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL)
JUDGE April 07, 2026 Deepak DPA
Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable
Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.07 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document