Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15763 (PNJ)

SAHINA v. STATE OF HARYANA, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

CWP/4815/2026 · 2026-04-07

Jagmohan Bansal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** 123 CWP-4815-2026 Date of Decision: 07.04.2026 SAHINA ...Petitioner Vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. …Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present:- Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate with Ms. Manisha Mashaal, Advocate for the petitioner Ms. Svaneel Jaswal, Addl. A.G. Haryana (assisted by Mr. Ravi Kumar, Naib Tehsildar, Ferozepur Thirka) *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondent to correct and rectify the name of petitioner’s village. 2. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that grievance of the petitioner stands redressed. 3. Disposed of 4. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE April 07, 2026 Deepak DPA Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No DEEPAK BISSYAN 2026.04.07 16:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document