[2026:RJ-JP:2611] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 987/2026 Surendra Alias Bablu S/o Ghisaram, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Pancheri Khurd, Police Station Pancheri Khurd, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg Mr. Nonit Hatila For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 21/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.127/2025 registered at Police Station Pacheri Kalan, District Jhunjhunu for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) & 238(a) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits thta the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case merely on suspicion. He also submits that even till date it has not been identified that who is the deceased. He also submits that the only evidence against the accused petitioner is recovery of his own pant at his instance which also does not find any blood stain. Counsel further submits that after a thorough investigation also, no motive has been traced out against the accused petitioner. He [2026:RJ-JP:2611] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-987/2026] also submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 07.07.2025 and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the trial of the case may take further long time. Counsel also submits that the co- accused namely Sunil Kumar and Vikram have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that during investigation it has come out that accused-petitioner has also been found to be involved in commissioning of the offence along with other co-accused. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has not pointed out any distinguishable feature in the case of the present accused- petitioner and so also the case of the co-accused namely Sunil Kumar and Vikram who have already been enlarged on bail. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and so as to maintain the parity, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) each, together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all [2026:RJ-JP:2611] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-987/2026] subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /12