Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19751 RFA No. 1136 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1136 OF 2025 (INJ) BETWEEN:
1.
MS JENNIFER JOEL, AGED 30 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LEONILA PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.2, M-403, 2ND FLOOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 043.
2.
MRS DAIZY JACQULINE AGED 57 YEARS, WIFE OF EMMANUEL BALARAJ MARIA SWAMY PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.2, M-403, 2ND FLOOR, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 043.
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY HER SPECIAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER MRS. FARZANA KHANUM. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. REGO L P E.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
MR.AMJAD PASHA AGED 65 YEARS, S/O MR. GAFFAR KHAN
2.
MRS. TASNEEM AMJAD AGED 60 YEARS,
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA J Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19751 RFA No. 1136 of 2025
W/O MR. AMJAD PASHA
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT:
THE WHITE HOUSE APARTMENT, NO.21/1, COLES ROAD, FRAZER TOWN, BENGALURU-560 005.
3.
ZIYU HOMES PRIVATE LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO & FOUNDER MR. AHMED ALI BAIG, OFFICE NO.485, SN TOWERS, 2ND FLOOR, HBR 3RD BLOCK, OPP. B.D.A. COMPLEX, POLICE CHOWKI, BENGALURU 560 043, CURRENTLY R/AT NO.2, M-403, 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD BLOCK, HRBR LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560 043. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SYED NASEERUDDIN, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1 & C/R2)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 25.11.2024 PASSED IN OS.NO.25534/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE LXXIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, (CCH-74), DECREEING THE SUIT FOR EVICTION, PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
ORAL JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo dated 09.04.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this appeal.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19751 RFA No. 1136 of 2025
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Office is directed to refund the Court fee in accordance with the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in High Court of Judicature at Madras vs. M.C.Subramaniam and Others - (2021) 3 SCC 560
Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE
BKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22