Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15757 (AP)

M YUVARAJA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/2495/2020 · 2026-01-22

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (SRS,J W.P.No.2495 of 2020) APHC010043072020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 2495/2020 Between: 1. M YUVARAJA, S/O SHANKARAIAH AGED ABOUT 58YRS, OCC AGRICULTURE R/O K.GOLLAPALLE VILLAGE KALIGIRI GRAMPANCHAYAT PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 2. K.JAYARAMA NAIDU, S/O PAPI NAIDU OCC AGRICULTURE R/O OBAYYAGARIPALLE VILLAGE PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3. K.P.DEVENDRA BABU, S/O K.P.SRINIVASULU OCC AGRICULTURE R/ O GOLLAPALLI VILLAGE, PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. K.ANANDA NAIDU, S/O RAMACHANDRA NAIDU R/O OBAYYAGARIPALLE VILLAGE PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. B.BABU NAIDU, S/O B.SRINIVASULU NAIDU R/O MORAVA KANDRIGA VILLAGE PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 6. B.DAMODARA NAIDU, S/O VENKATAPPA NAIDU R/O MORAVA KANDRIGA VILLAGE PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 7. K.TYAGARAJA NAIDU, S/O SHANKAR NAIDU OCC AGRICULTURE R/ O K.YELLAMPALLI VILLAGE PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 8. K.LOKANADHA NAIDU, S/O ANNASAMI NAIDU OCC AGRICULTURE R/O K.YELLAMPALLI VILLAGE PENUMURU MANDAL, CHITTOOR 2 (SRS,J W.P.No.2495 of 2020) DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (EANDR) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PANCHAYATRAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH GUNTUR 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 5. THE KALIGIRI GRAMPANCHAYAT KALIGIRI VILLAGE, PENUMUR MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.1 in issuing the G.O.Ms.No.11, dt.06-01-2020 bifurcating respondent No.5 Grampanchayat and to constitute the Morava Kandriga Grampanchayat as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to the provisions of the A.P. Grampanchayats Notification/ Constitution of villages),Rules 2007and consequently set aside the G.O.Ms.No.11, dt06-01-2020 issued by the respondent No.1 IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the G.O.Ms.No.11, dt.06-01-2020 issued by the 1st respondent pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C JHANSI RANI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 (SRS,J W.P.No.2495 of 2020) 1. V VINOD K REDDY The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: In pursuance of the letter dated 05.01.2025 addressed to the Registrar (Judicial), learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated 23.01.2026. RPD. 4 (SRS,J W.P.No.2495 of 2020) HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI (DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN) WRIT PETITION No.2495 OF 2020 Dated :23.01.2026 RPD.