Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15756 (PAT)

Abhishek Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./31510/2026 · 2026-05-12

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31510 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2025 Thana- RATWARA District- Madhepura ====================================================== Abhishek Kumar son of Mahesh Bhagat @ Mahesh Kumar Bhagat Resident of Village- sonamukhi Bajar, Ps- Kishanpur Ratwara, Dist- Madhepua ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, Advocate Ms. Pooja Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 12-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ratwara P.S. Case No.52 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 308(5) & 3(5) of the BNS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with one Shubham has gone to the shop of the informant and Shubham has fired repeatedly at Raja Kumar. He has also demanded rangdaari of rupees One lakh. Raja Kumar succumbed to the injuries. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the FIR it is clear Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31510 of 2026(2) dt.12-05-2026 2/2 that main thrust of allegation is against the co-accused Shubham. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation against the petitioner is that he was present there and was being armed with weapon. Learned counsel has further submitted that there is no allegation of any overt act against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 11.11.2025. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the court of learned C.J.M./concerned court, Madhepura in connection with Ratwara P.S. Case No.52 of 2025. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T