Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15752 (BOM)

MUKESHKUMAR SHAH v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/1726/2026 · 2026-10-06

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

915.ABA-1726.26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1726 OF 2026 Mukeshkumar Shah … Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. …. Respondents ______________________ Mr. Ajay A. Joshi, for the Applicant. Mr. P. P. Jadhav, APP, for the Respondent No.1-State. Mr. A. M. Sarogi, for Respondent No.2. Mr. Suraj Bendre, P. I. attached to Bibawewadi Police Station, Pune City present. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 6 OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. At the outset, learned APP appearing for the Respondent- State points out that there is one antecedent which has not been disclosed in the Anticipatory Bail Application. 2. In view of the said contention raised by the learned APP, Mr. Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file fresh Anticipatory Bail Application. Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.10.07 11:19:29 +0530 915.ABA-1726.26.DOC 3. Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such with liberty as sought for. 4. It is clarified that this Court has not considered merits and all contentions on merits are expressly kept open. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 2 PPN