Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15749 (RAJ)

DR. ASIF P S/O ABDUL NAZAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/851/2026 · 2026-01-16

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 851/2026 Dr. Asif P S/o Abdul Nazar ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan & Ors. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 16/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has qualified the written examination and has been called for an interview for SR-ship at AIIMS, New Delhi, which is an Institute of National Importance (INI) and thus, as the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish an undertaking to the respondents that she will serve the bond period with the State Government after completion of her tenure at AIIMS, New Delhi, the respondents be directed to release her original documents, the same being sine qua non for her to appear in the interview. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent, though has disputed the prayer sought by the petitioner, however, is not able to refute that the petitioner has clearly passed the written examination of AIIMS, New Delhi and has been called for interview therein, which requires the petitioner to submit the original documents. 3. Considering the facts obtained, the application for interim relief is disposed of in the terms that, as the petitioner has qualified the written examination of AIIMS, New Delhi, which is an Institute of National Importance (INI) and has been called for an interview for SR-ship at AIIMS, New Delhi, alongwith her original (2 of 2) [CW-851/2026] documents, the respondents are directed to release the original documents of the petitioner, immediately on furnishing of an undertaking by the petitioner to the effect that she would serve the State Government for the period as stipulated in the bond executed and submitted by her after completion of the tenure of her SR-ship at AIIMS, New Delhi. The undertaking would also state that in the event of she failing to serve the State Government, she would pay the amount to the State Government as mentioned in the bond. 4. As the petitioner has duly submitted her willingness to furnish the undertaking and even the learned counsel for the petitioner has made the said submission at bar, a copy of the undertaking so furnished by the petitioner be also filed before this Court and be made part of the record so as to ensure that the conditions stipulated in the undertaking are duly adhered to by the petitioner. The undertaking is to be filed before this Court within one week of furnishing of the same with the State Government. 5. It is also clarified that the said directions for release of documents are being issued in the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, more particularly considering the fact that the petitioner has been granted SR-ship at AIIMS, New Delhi, which is an Institute of National Importance. Further, since the interview is scheduled on 19.01.2026, in case the said undertaking is furnished by the petitioner, the respondents are directed to release the original documents to the petitioner forthwith. 6. Accordingly, the said application stands disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /125