Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15748 (AP)

Mailamba v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/2711/2026 · 2026-02-15

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010042832026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 2711/2026 Between: 1. MAILAMBA, W/O. K. KANNAN. AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DEVADODDI VILLAGE, BAIREDLAPALLIMANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT, 2. K. KARTHIKEYAN, S/O. LATE K. KUPPASWAMY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. DEVADODDI VILLAGE, BAIREDLAPALLIMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR.517001 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, CHITTOOR.517001 4. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATH OFFICER, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517001 5. THE MANDALPANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, BAIREDDIPALLE MANDAL,CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517415 6. THE DEVEDODDI VILLAGE GRAM PANCHAYATH, REP BY ITS PANCHAYATH SECRETARY, DEVADODDI VILLAGE, p. 2 BAIREDDIPALLEMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517415 7. THE TAHASILDAR, BAIREDDIPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517415 8. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BAIREDDIPALLE MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517415 9. AMMER BASHA, S/O. DIWAN SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O. DEVADODDI VILLAGE THOTAKNUMA POST, BAIREDDIPALLEMANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517415 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents No.5 to 9 in demolishing the houses constructed in House Plot Nos. 4 and 5 in an extant of 0.02 Cents each in Sy.No.322 of Devadoddi Village, Bairedlapalli Mandal, Chittoor District, belong to the petitioners without even waiting for submission our explanation to the notice, dated 03-01-2026 issued by the respondent No.6 and now again trying to disposes the petitioner from the same as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and contrary to the well established legal principles apart from being voilative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents No.5 to 9 not to interfere without rights over the House Plot No's. 4 and 5 in an extant of 0.02 Cents each in Sy.No.322 of Devadoddi Village, Bairedlapalli Mandal, Chittoor District, belong to the petitioner, without following due process of law and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 4 not to dispossess petitioners from the House Plot No's. 4 and 5 in an extant of 0.02 Cents each in Sy.No.322 of Devadoddi Village, Bairedlapalli Mandal, Chittoor District, belong to the petitioners without following due process of law pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such p. 3 IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents No.2 to 4 to consider the representation submitted by the petitioners dated 07-01-2026, and immediate appropriate action on the same pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S PARINEETA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: Sri A. Manju Nadha Raju, learned counsel representing Ms. S. Parineeta, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 16.02.2026 TVN p. 4 34 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.2711 OF 2026 Date : 16.02.2026 TVN