Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15745 (MAD)

G.PREMKUMAR v. The Univeristy Grants commission

WP/9539/2026 · 2026-03-12

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 9539 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 12-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 9539 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 10277 OF 2026 G.Premkumar ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The University Grants commission Bahadur Sha Zafar Marg, New Delhi 110 002 Alternative office, No 35 Feroze shah road, New Delhi 110 001 2. The Dean College of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology (SRMIST), Kattankulathru, Chengalpattu District, Tamil nadu 603 203 ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus Call for the records with respect to the impugned Email dated 25.05.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and directing the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner as an Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department without insisting for Mandatory completion of Ph. D., Degree with all back wages with interest. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9539 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 3 For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.S.Sundaramoorthy ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- “Call for the records with respect to the impugned Email dated 25.05.2023 issued by the 2nd respondent and quash the same and directing the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner as an Assistant Professor in the Civil Engineering Department without insisting for Mandatory completion of Ph. D., Degree with all back wages with interest.” 2. The petitioner seeks to quash an e-mail issued by the 2nd respondent dated 25.05.2023 and also seeks a direction directing the 2nd respondent to reinstate him in service. However, the 2nd respondent is a private college and is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. As the relief sought for is against the 2nd respondent, a private institution, the writ petition is not maintainable. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 12-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SHR To 1. The University Grants commission Bahadur Sha Zafar Marg,New Delhi 110 002 Alternative office,No 35 Feroze shah road, New Delhi 110 001 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9539 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 3 P.T.ASHA J. SHR WP No. 9539 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 10277 OF 2026 12-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis