Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15739 (BOM)

Rajendra Ravindra Randhir v. Sanjeet Pathak

REVN/213/2026 · 2026-10-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

49-REVN-213-2026 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 213 OF 2026 Rajendra Ravindra Randhir ...Applicant/s VERSUS Sanjeet Pathak and Anr. ...Respondent/s _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Ravi S. Jadhav, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Amey Patil i/by Shubham Agrahari, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned counsel for Respondent No.1 and learned APP. 2. Learned APP submits that this revision application is not maintainable and the Applicant has to file appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Revision Application with liberty to file an appeal. 4. Considering the submissions of both learned counsel, Revision Application is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty,. 5. If appeal is filed, Registry shall not raise an issue of limitation. 6. Revision Application is disposed of accordingly. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.10.06 17:43:15 +0530