Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15738 (RAJ)

NEERAJ S/O DEENDAYAL @ PAPPU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/1166/2026 · 2026-01-22

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3031] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1166/2026 1. Neeraj S/o Deendayal @ Pappu, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Dahgaon, Police Station Sadar, Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). 2. Pushpendra Kumar S/o Narayan Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Dahgaon, Police Station Sadar, Bayana, District Bharatpur. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Bayana, District Bharatpur). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP Mr. Subham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 22/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.151/2025 registered at Police Station Bayana, District Bharatpur for the offence punishable u/S 318(4), 319(2), 322, 323, 336(3), 338, 340(2), 303(2) of BNS. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 3. The allegation against the accused petitioners is of conspiracy with the co-accused for misappropriation of money [2026:RJ-JP:3031] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1166/2026] from the complainant. The accused petitioner is said to be in custody since 13.12.2025. From perusal of the contents of the FIR, there is no direct allegation against the present accused petitioners of taking any money from the complainant. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners and taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that there is no direction allegation against the present accused petitioners, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioners on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only)(each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /177