Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15735 (RAJ)

RAVINDRA RAWAT S/O JANAK SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/1083/2026 · 2026-01-22

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2880] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1083/2026 Ravindra Rawat S/o Janak Singh, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Huawani, Post Singorai, Tehsil Bari, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director State Health And Family Welfare Institution, Jaipur. 3. The Director (Non-Gazette), Medical And Health Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 22/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner has put his reliance upon the dictum encapsulated in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15058/2024 titled Rajbala & Ors. Versus The State of Rajasthan & Ors. (Annexure-13). Further, learned counsel placed his reliance upon order dated 23.07.2025, which has been passed in pursuance of the representation submitted by the petitioner, and it is submitted that without verifying the fact of the payment made through cash and the period of service, non-speaking order came to be passed qua the petitioner. Moreover, it is submitted that the experience certificate may duly be verified by the [2026:RJ-JP:2880] (2 of 2) [CW-1083/2026] respondents and the order dated 23.07.2025 may be set aside and a fresh order may be passed in the light of ratio encapsulated in Rajbala (supra) and S.B.CWPNo.14929/2024 (Annexure-12) relevant extract from which is reproduced herein below: "(1) One post of Female Health Worker pursuant to advertisement dated 19.05.2023 shall be kept vacant for each of the petitioners in the district(s) of their preference vis-a-vis their merit position till final verification of their experience certificate. (2) The petitioners shall be posted as per their preference vis-a-vis their merit position if found eligible ultimately qua their experience certificate." 2. Learned counsel for the respondents, Mr. Prakhar Jain appearing on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC, submits that the instant matter can be disposed of and the respondent-authorities will verify the experience certificate in light of the said dictum and appropriate orders will be passed, in accordance with law, within a period of 60 days. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in light of above-referred dictum of Rajbala (Supra). Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /10