AVIWAQAS ARBAZ MALIK ALIAS ABIWAKAS MALIK ALIAS ARBAZ v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4238/2026 · 2026-06-08
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15733 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15733 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
{ 2026:JHHC:16340} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.4238 of 2026
------
1. Aviwaqas Arbaz Malik @ Abiwakas Malik @ Arbaz Son of Akhlak Malik aged about 22 years.
2. Mohtasam Ansari @ Golu Son of Md Saharyar Ansari aged about 23 years. Both are Residents of Village- Dukra Kuttar P.O. Pabra P.S.- Katkamsandi Dist- Hazaribag (Jharkhand).
… Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand.
… Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioners : Md. Razaullah Ansari, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P.
------
Order No:-02 Dated:-08-06-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No. 241 of 2025, corresponding to G.R. Case No.279 of 2026, S.T. No. 114 of 2026, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 111(2)(b), 111(6), 111(7), 112(2), 317(4), 317(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners being the member of an organized gang of criminals are involved in commission of theft of motorcycle. It is submitted that except the confessional statement, there is no other material to implicate the petitioners in this case. It is further submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 11 of instant bail application and it has falsely been alleged that the petitioners were involved in 29 other cases. Though, the petitioners have no knowledge about any pending cases nor they have been remanded in other cases except this case. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is now submitted that charge has been framed, but no witnesses have been
examined as yet. It is lastly submitted that petitioners are in custody since 26.11.2025 as mentioned in para-13 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail.
Learned P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners are
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge X Hazaribagh, in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No. 241 of 2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.279 of 2026, S.T. No. 114 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
08/06/2026 Amar/