Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15731 (CHH)

GULAM JAINUL ABEDIN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/201/2026 · 2026-01-15

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:2671 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 201 of 2026 Gulam Jainul Abedin S/o Shri Md. Ikaramuddin Aged About 45 Years R/o Bhagat Singh Chowk, Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon (C.G.). ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.). 2 - The Commissioner Durg, Division Durg (C.G.). 3 - The Collector Balod, District- Balod (C.G.). 4 - The Sub-Divisional Officer (Revenue) Daundilohara, District- Balod (C.G.). 5 - The Tahsildar Tahsil - Daundilohara, District- Balod (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Shri Keshav Dewangan, Advocate. For State/ Respondent : Shri Pranjal Shukla, Panel Lawyer. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 16/01/2026 AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.01.19 14:54:49 +0530 2 1. At the outset, counsel for the petitioner submits that by way of this Writ Petition, petitioner is challenging the inaction of Respondent No.2 before whom second appeal (Case No.356/A-6/2024-25) filed by the petitioner on 22.07.2025 (Annexure P/11) is still pending as Respondent No.2 has not decided the said second appeal. 2. It has been informed by counsel for the petitioner that the appeal is listed for hearing in the month of February, 2026. 3. Since the appeal has been listed for hearing by Respondent No.2 in the month of February, at this juncture, no direction is required to be issued. However, it is expected from Respondent No.2 to decide the second appeal filed by the petitioner expeditiously. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE Avinash