1 954.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 954 WRIT PETITION NO. 6538 OF 2026 DHANRAJ TARACHAND PAWAR AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. More Kumar Gaurav M. AGP/APP for Respondent/State : Ms. Neha B. Kamble Advocate for Respondent No.5 : Mr. S.S.Nade … CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ. DATE : 02.07.2026 PER COURT : . By this Writ Petition, the petitioners are challenging the final award dated 13.09.2021 declared by respondent No.3 on the grounds stated in the petition. 2. Learned AGP submits that the petitioners have an alternate efficacious remedy under Section 34 of the ‘Maharashtra Industrial Development Act,1961 (‘MIDC Act’). 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to avail the alternate remedy. 4. The time spent in prosecuting this petition shall be taken into consideration while considering the application for condonation of delay, if any. ( ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. ) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J. ) vsj.. 2026:BHC-AUG:25800-DB