HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 12900 of 2026 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Shri Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that considering the subsequent development, this writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous. 2. The aforesaid prayer has not been objected by Shri Sant Ram Sharma, Advocate along with Shri Sunil Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for respondents. 3. In light of such facts the writ petition is dismissed as infructous. 4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. May 7, 2026 Nadeem Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Tiwari, Kripa Shankar Pandey, Ashish Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sant Ram Sharma (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Sudhir Kumar Tiwari And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADEEM AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad