Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15729 (GAU)

SAMPA NATH v. SMTI PRONOTI NATH AND 5 ORS

I.A.(Civil)/2253/2025 · 2026-10-04

Mridul Kumar Kalita

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010154162025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/2253/2025 SAMPA NATH D/O LATE SOMIRON CHANDRA NATH, R/O PALLYSREE LANE, TARAPUR VII, P.O. TARAPUR, PROGONA BARAKPAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS SMTI PRONOTI NATH AND 5 ORS W/O LATE SOMIRON CH. NATH, R/O PALLYSREE LANE, TARAPUR VII, P.O. TARAPUR, PROGONA BARAKPAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM, PIN 788003 2:MISS POMPI NATH W/O LATE SOMIRON CH. NATH R/O PALLYSREE LANE TARAPUR VII P.O. TARAPUR PROGONA BARAKPAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788003 3:SAMOR DEB S/O LATE SODOY CHANDRA DEB R/O PALLYSREE LANE TARAPUR VII P.O. TARAPUR Page No.# 2/4 PROGONA BARAKPAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788003 4:SONTOSH NATH S/O LATE SOMIRON CH. NATH R/O PALLYSREE LANE TARAPUR VII P.O. TARAPUR PROGONA BARAKPAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788003 5:BIDHAN CHANDRA NATH S/O LATE BHARAT NATH 6:BIPASA NATH D/O BIDHAN CHANDRA NATH R/O MISSION ROAD SUDHANGSHY PHARMACY P.O. AND P.S. KARIMGANJ DIST. CACHAR ASSAM PIN 788710 (DEFENDANT NO. 6 IS A MINOR AND REPRESENTED BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN I.E. HER FATHER THE DEFENDANT NO. 5 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I ALAM, MR. T SK Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D MAZUMDAR (R-3), MR C GOGOI(R-3),MS. S NATH(R-3) Linked Case : OC/0/0 SMTI SAMPA NATH D/O LATE SOMIRON CHANDRA NATH RESIDENT OF PALLYSREE LANE TARAPUR-VII Page No.# 3/4 P.0. TARAPUR PROGONA- BARAKPAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM VERSUS SMTI PRONOTI NATH W/O LATE SOMIRON CH. NATH RESIDENT OF PALLYSREE LANE TARAPUR- VII P.O. TARAPUR PROGONA- BARAKPAR DISTRICT- CACHAR ASSAM. PIN- 788003 ------------ Advocate for : MD TAIZUDDIN SK Advocate for : appearing for SMTI PRONOTI NATH BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 05.10.2026 1. Heard Mr. T Sk, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that the applicant does not want to proceed with the instant case and as such prays for allowing him to withdraw the same. In support of his submission, he has furnished a letter addressed to him by the applicant on 25.09.2026. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this matter is dismissed on withdrawal. Page No.# 4/4 4. The letter dated 25.09.2026 be marked as ‘X’ and be kept as part of the record. JUDGE Comparing Assistant