LAXMINARAYAN S/O LATE SHRI POKHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1136/2026 · 2026-01-29
Maneesh Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15727 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15727 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4030] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1136/2026
1. Laxminarayan S/o Late Shri Pokhar, Aged About 96 Years,
2. Ramkaran S/o Late Shri Pokhar, Aged About 85 Years,
3. Ramgopal S/o Late Shri Pokhar, Aged About 92 Years,
4. Ramdayal S/o Late Shri Ramnarayan, aged 55 Years, All are residents of Village Mandi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Rajasthan through Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. District Collector, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
3. Tehsildar, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
4. Nayab Tehsildar, Sub-Tehsil Neemhera, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
5. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Mandi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
6. Ramras Choudhary S/o Late Shri Goru Lal Jat, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Kulwalo Ka Bas, Mandi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan)
7. Ram Lal S/o Late Shri Ramchandra, Aged About 76 Years, R/o Kulwalo Ka Bas, Mandi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Pareek with Ms. Apurva Maharshi For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 29/01/2026
1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"It is therefore in these circumstances prayed that the Hon'ble Court may kindly accept and allow the writ petition and be pleased to: i) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the Respondent No.1 to 5 may kindly be direct to drop the proceedings or re- moval of petitioners from their respective land which are part
[2026:RJ-JP:4030] (2 of 3) [CW-1136/2026] and parcel of Khasra No.379 situated in Village Mandi, Tehsil Phagi, District Jaipur; ii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent No.1 to 5 to pass a final order in the matter on the basis of their enquiry and report submitted by various revenue authorities; iii) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents 1 to 5 make proper entries in revenue record to avoid any further litigation; iv) by an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondent No.1 to 5 authorities may kindly be directed to initiate proceed- ings against respondent No.6 & 7 for their unnecessary and un- wanted litigation and this Hon'ble Court may further direct the respondent No.1 to 5 to take punitive action against the re- spondent No.6 & 7; v.) Any other appropriate order or direction which is deemed just and proper by this Hon'ble Court may also be passed in favour of the petitioners and in the interest of justice. vi.) Cost of the writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the petitioners."
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners, upon instructions from his clients, submits that the petitioners would be satisfied if: the petitioners are permitted to file a fresh representation before the respondent No.2-District Collector, Jaipur narrating their grievances as encapsulating in the present writ petition; and if a direction may be issued to respondent No.2 to decide the same in a time bound manner.
3. Heard.
4. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before respondent No.2 within a period of three (3) weeks from today. The respondent No.2 is directed to decide the said representation within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of filing of such representation by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with the law.
5. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioners' grievance. The same shall
[2026:RJ-JP:4030] (3 of 3) [CW-1136/2026] not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner.
6. Furthermore, it is needless to say that after adjudication of the representation, if any cause of action still survives, the petitioners would be at liberty to avail further remedies available under the law.
7. Other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA/RAHUL-6