APHC010040492014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2281] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1059/2014 Between: 1. G.V.RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O (LATE) POTHURAJU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O FLAT NO: 405, PARK RESIDENCEY, SAJJAPURAM,TANUKU W.G.DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KOTHA VENKATESWARLU, S/O KUTUMBA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PASUPATHI NAGAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM W.G. DIST 2. KALIGINEEDI MANGA RAJU, S/O VENKATRA RAO, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, D-NO:5-14, BODASAKURRU, ALLAVARAM MANDAL, E.G.DT., 3. KALIGINEEDI SATYA NARAYANA, S/O VENKATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, D-NO:4-30, VUYYURIVARIMERAKA, ANTERVEDI SIVARU, SAKINETIPALLI MANDAL, E.G.DT. 4. SUNKARA NARASANNA, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, DR-NO:4-420, VUYYURIVARIMERAKA, ANTERVEDI SIVARU, SAKINETIPALLI MANDAL, E.G.DT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V S S KAMESWARA RAO 2 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 3 The Court made the following ORDER : The contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 10.02.2014 passed in C.R.P.No.397 of 2014. 2. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘likely to be declared as infructuous’, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. However, the Registry has placed on record, the order passed in C.R.P.No.397 of 2014, whereby the main civil revision petition itself was dismissed as infructuous. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication. 4. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 24.03.2026 Dvs 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 87 CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1059/2014 Dt: 24.03.2026 Dvs