Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15723 (PNJ)

DARSHAN KUMAR SINGLA AND OTHERS v. GAUTAM JAIN, IAS

COCP/398/2026 · 2026-03-24

Pankaj Jain

Special Leave Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

108 AT CHANDIGARH COCP-398-2026 Date of decision : 24.03.2026 DARSHAN KUMAR SINGLA AND OTHERS ....Petitioners Versus GAUTAM JAIN, IAS .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present : Mr. J.P. Rana, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Nitin Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Athar Ahmed, Advocate for the respondent. PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) The petitioners seek action against the respondent for having disobeyed the order passed by the Writ Court deliberately. 2. It is a matter of record that the order passed by the Writ Court as affirmed in the Intra Court Appeal i.e., LPA No.1628/2024 vide order dated 13.01.2025, is now subject matter of SLP(C) No.8020/2025, wherein the notice has been issued. 3. In view thereof, this Court does not find it to be a case of wilful disobedience. 4. In the aforesaid peculiar facts & circumstances of the case, this Court finds no reason to keep the present contempt petition pending. The same is disposed off. DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.03.24 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP-398-2026 -2- 5. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to move an appropriate application for revival of the contempt petition, in case the need so arises. March 24, 2026 (Pankaj Jain) Dpr Judge Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR 2026.03.24 16:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document