Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15723 (BOM)

ARUN VINOD JAISWAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/2202/2026 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

911-aba2202-26.doc vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2202 OF 2026 Arun Vinod Jaiswar ...Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra ...Respondent Mr.Karim Pathan with Mr.Fazlur Rahiman Shaikh, Mr.Shane Illahi Turkej , Mr.Fardeen Shaikh and Mr.Shoaib Shaikh for the Applicant. Ms.Megha S. Bajoria, APP for the Respondent – State. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , J. DATE : 7 TH OCTOBER , 2026. P.C. :- 1. After learned APP pointed out that the applicant has not disclosed the criminal antecedents being an offence registered with Charkop Police Station, at Crime no. 171, learned counsel for applicant seeks leave to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file fresh application after disclosing all the criminal antecedents in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court in Zeba Khan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh 2026 SCC OnLine SC 188. 2. Accordingly, the instant application is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) 1/1 VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2026.10.07 18:35:51 +0530