Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1572 (MAD)

R. Shantha v. Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd.,

WP/10648/2026 · 2026-03-23

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 10648 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 10648 of 2026 R. Shantha W/o. S.Vetrivel, No.34 Panjali NAgar, Annathanapatty (PO), Salem 636 002 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Aavin Illam No. 3A, Pasumpon Muthuramalinganar Salai, Nandhanam, Chennai 35. 2. Salem district co-operative Milk producers Union Ltd., Rep. by its General Manager, Sithanur, Thalavaipatty, Salem 636 302 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to disburse the pensionary and terminal benefits to the petitioner within a stipulated period. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Parthasarathy For Respondent(s): Mr.V.Raghupathi, Standing Counsel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10648 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The writ petition has been filed for the following relief: “directing the respondents to disburse the pensionary and terminal benefits to the petitioner within a stipulated period.” 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was appointed as Personal Clerk in the second respondent society and retired from service. While so, the second respondent issued a notice dated 06.10.2021 calling upon the petitioner for an enquiry u/s 81 of society Act. The petitioner submitted her detailed explanation. The Enquiry Officer after conducting the enquiry, held that the charges were not proved against the petitioner. However, the second respondent ordered a re-enquiry. Subsequently, the petitioner was permitted to retire on 31.03.2024 by withholding her terminal benefits. Thereafter, no final orders were passed for the re-enquiry and therefore, the petitioner’s terminal benefits were not disbursed. Since there is no response for the petitioner’s representation, aggrieved petitioner is before this Court. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials on record. 4. It is stated that though the re-enquiry had been completed and the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10648 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Enquiry Officer has submitted his report to the second respondent as early as in the year 2022, the second respondent is yet to pass orders. Therefore, the Writ petition is disposed of with the following directions ie., mandamus is issued directing the second respondent to pass orders based on the report submitted by the Enquiry Officer on or before 28.04.2026. No costs. 5. For reporting compliance, post the matter on 29.04.2026. 23-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No ssa To 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., Aavin Illam No. 3A, Pasumpon Muthuramalinganar Salai, Nandhanam, Chennai 35. 2.The General Manager, Salem district co-operative Milk producers Union Ltd., Sithanur, Thalavaipatty, Salem 636 302 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 10648 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 P.T.ASHA, J. ssa WP No. 10648 of 2026 23-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis