Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15718 (GAU)

ABDUS SALAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

Bail Appln./2670/2026 · 2026-10-05

Robin Phukan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010196562026 2026:GAU-AS:14902 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2670/2026 ABDUS SALAM S/O MUKHED ALI, RESIDENT OF BHOUKAMARI, P.S. BARPETA, DISTRICT BARPETA, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SUSHEN RAJKUMAR S/O BONOMALI RAJKUMAR R/O BONDA COLONY P.S. PRAGJYOTISHPUR DISTRICT KAMRUP (METRO) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. A E HUSSAIN,MR. S HAQUE Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MS. S NEWAR(R2) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 06.10.2026 Heard Mr. S. M. Abdullah. P., learned counsel for the accused and Mr. B. Sarma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Also heard Ms. S. Newar, learned Page No.# 2/2 Amicus Curiae for the respondent No. 2. 2. Mr. B. Sarma, learned APP, submits that though he was directed to produce the case diary before this Court, yet, as per his instruction, the I.O. has completed investigation and submitted charge-sheet, being Charge-sheet No. 99/2026, dated 30.09.2026. 3. At this stage, Mr. Abdullah, learned counsel for the accused submits that since charge-sheet has already been submitted in this matter, this petition may be closed, by granting liberty to the accused to approach the learned Trial Court. 4. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of the learned counsels for both the parties, this Court is inclined to close this petition, by directing the petitioner to approach the learned Trial Court by filing appropriate petition. And on such application being filed, the learned Trial Court shall consider the same in accordance with law. 5. In terms of the above, this bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant