[2026:RJ-JP:2674] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 983/2026 Hidayat Ali S/o Lukmal Ali, Age 38 Years, R/o Bhanu’s Shop Street Near Imambada, Deshwali Mohalla Gandhinagar Kis- hangarh Police Station Gandhinagar District Ajmer Rajasthan Presently Ramzan Khan Ka Makan, Near Imambada, Sarana Road Chamdagar Madanganj Kishangarh P.S. Gandhinagar, Dis- trict Ajmer. (At Present in Judicial Custody in Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 21/01/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.126/2025 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer for offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) & 308(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. During the course of investigation, offences punishable under Section 111(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3/21 & 5/21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 have also been added against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that co-accused persons namely- Balveer Vaishnav and Narendra @ Nanu have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel [2026:RJ-JP:2674] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-983/2026] submits that petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that aforesaid co-accused persons have already been granted benefit of bail by this Court as well as co-ordinate Bench of this Court and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. 6. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Hidayat Ali S/o Lukmal Ali shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /57