Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15715 (DEL)

SONIA VERMA & ORS. v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

CRL.M.C./2702/2026 · 2026-08-11

Madhu Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010148452026 + CRL.M.C. 2702/2026 SONIA VERMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, Mr. Rajendra Singh and Ms. Shreya Mishra, Advs. with petitioners in person. versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP with SI Bhavna, PS Hari Nagar Mr. Sudhanshu Tyagi, Adv. for R-2 with R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 11.08.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. By the way of the present petition the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 251/2025, registered at Police Station Vikaspuri, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 79/351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sahita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNS’) and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 3. Issue notice. The learned APP for the state accepts notice on behalf of the State. 4. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2026 at 11:50:27 5. Briefly stated, a monetary dispute arose between the petitioners and respondent No.2 concerning an amount allegedly paid for investment in Bitcoin. On 26.07.2025, respondent No.2 visited the residence of petitioner No.1, where she was allegedly confined, abused, threatened and assaulted. Consequently, FIR No.251/2025 was registered on 31.07.2025 at Police Station Vikaspuri. Subsequently, the parties amicably resolved their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) dated 02.04.2026. Respondent No.2 has no objection to the quashing of the FIR and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 6. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into a compromise vide MOU dated 02.04.2026, out of her own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, she has no objection if the present FIR is quashed. 7. In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their differences out of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. 8. Accordingly, FIR No. 251/2025, registered at Police Station Vikaspuri, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 79/351(2) of BNS, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed. 9. The present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. 10. Copy of the order be communicated to the concerned learned Trial This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2026 at 11:50:27 Court for necessary action and compliance. 11. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 11, 2026/JYH/m This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/08/2026 at 11:50:27