HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16411 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant petition has been filed on behalf of the petitioners seeking retiral benefits after reckoning their entire period of service from the date of appointment. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondents submits that the grievance of the petitioners, as raised in the instant writ petition, has already been decided by the competent authority. 4. In view of the above, after due deliberation at length, the learned counsel for the petitioners has prays for to dismiss the instant writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition challenging the order passed by the competent authority. 5. In view of the aforesaid statement, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for. October 7, 2026 vkg Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kant Tripathi, Praveen Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurav Kumar Chaturvedi, Saurabh Tiwari (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Bahadur And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad