Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15710 (RAJ)

KAJOD SHARMA SON OF SHRI LADU SHARMA v. SHYOJIRAM SHARMA SON OF SHRI LADU SHARMA

CW/1153/2026 · 2026-02-02

Anuroop Singhi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:4744] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1153/2026 Kajod Sharma Son Of Shri Ladu Sharma, Aged About 66 Years, Resident Of Village Aakodiya, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shyojiram Sharma Son Of Shri Ladu Sharma, Resident Of Village Aakodiya, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 2. Chitar Sharma Son Of Shri Ladu Sharma, Resident Of Village Aakodiya, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 3. Nathulal Sharma Son Of Shri Ladu Sharma, Resident Of Village Aakodiya, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Tehsildar, Chaksu, Tehsil Chaksu District Jaipur. 5. Sub-Registrar Chaksu, Tehsil Chaksu, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prahlad Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bajrang Lal Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 02/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for both the parties have jointly prayed that the present writ petition may be disposed of directing the Board of Revenue, Ajmer, to decide the Revision Petition No.T.A./12581/2025 titled as Chitar Sharma Vs. Kajod Sharma and Ors., expeditiously and preferably on the next date i.e., 20.02.2026 or maximum within thirty days thereafter. 2. Considering the fact that the said Revision Petition has been filed only against an interim order and both the learned counsel for the parties have agreed that they will argue the matter on the next date, this Court deems it just and proper to direct the Board [2026:RJ-JP:4744] (2 of 2) [CW-1153/2026] of Revenue, Ajmer, to decide the Revision Petition No.T.A./12581/2025 titled as Chitar Sharma Vs. Kajod Sharma and Ors., on the next date i.e., 20.02.2026 or within a period of thirty days thereafter subject to its convenience, in accordance with law. 3. Upon the Revision Petition being decided, the record of the Revenue Appellate Authority be send back forthwith. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DANISH USMANI /51