Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15707 (GAU)

SAFIOR RAHMAN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS

WP(C)/2230/2023 · 2026-10-05

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010085892023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2230/2023 SAFIOR RAHMAN S/O- MD. WAZUDDIN SK., R/O- VILLAGE- BAKUABHANGI, P.O. BILASIPARA, DIST.- DHUBRI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 8 ORS REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6 2:THE DIRECTOR OF PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT PANJABARI KHANAPARA GUWAHATI ASSAM PIN- 781037 3:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION ASSAM HOUSEFED COMPLEX GUWAHATI-6 4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GHY-6 5:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GHY-29 Page No.# 2/3 6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GOALPARA P.O. GOALPARA DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101 7:THE PROJECT DIRECTOR DISTRICT RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY GOALPARA P.O. GOALPARA DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783101 8:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER RANGJULI DEVELOPMENT BLOCK RANGJULI P.O. RANGJULI DIST.- GOALPARA ASSAM PIN- 783134 9:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER GOLOKGANJ DEVELOPMENT BLOCK P.O. GOLOKGANJ DIST.- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 78333 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH, K U AHMED,MS F INTAZ Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, AG (A AND E),MR. A HASAN,SC, P AND R.D. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 06.10.2026 Heard Shri S. S. Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Shri M. A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri A. K. Ghosh, learned counsel representing the P&RD; Shri A. Chakraborty, learned State Page No.# 3/3 Counsel and Shri C. Baruah, learned Senior Standing Counsel, Accountant General, Assam. In view of the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed during the pendency of the writ petition, the writ petition is closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant