Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010192202026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3185/2026 MOTIOR RAHMAN ALIAS MATAUR RAHMAN AND ORS S/O LT. MAULABI ABDUL RAHMAN, R/O VILLAGE KATAJHAR GAON, P.O. GABARDHANA, P.S. GABARDHANA, DIST. BAKSA BTC, ASSAM, PIN- 781315. 2: MIJANUR RAHMAN S/O LT. MAULABI ABDUL RAHMAN R/O VILLAGE KATAJHAR GAON P.O. GABARDHANA P.S. GABARDHANA DIST. BAKSA BTC ASSAM PIN-781315. 3: MUKHLESAR RAHMAN S/O LT. MAULABI ABDUL RAHMAN R/O VILLAGE KATAJHAR GAON P.O. GABARDHANA P.S. GABARDHANA DIST. BAKSA BTC ASSAM PIN-781315. 4: MUSTAFIJUR RAHMAN S/O LT. MAULABI ABDUL RAHMAN R/O VILLAGE KATAJHAR GAON P.O. GABARDHANA P.S. GABARDHANA DIST. BAKSA BTC ASSAM PIN-781315. 5: RAHIMA KHATUN D/O LT. ABDUL RAHMAN Page No.# 2/3 R/O VILLAGE KATAJHAR GAON P.O. GABARDHANA P.S. GABARDHANA DIST. BAKSA BTC ASSAM PIN-781315 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM WELFARE OF PLAIN TRIBES AND BACKWARD CLASSES DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 2:SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER GOSAIGAON PO KOKRAJHAR KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN 783370 3:THE SECRETARY MARKET AND FAIRS DEPARTMENT BODOLAND AUTONOMOUS COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN-783370. 4:THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL AREA DISTRICTS AT KOKRAJHAR REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY P.O. KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN-783370. 5:THE JOINT SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL BODOFA NWGWR KOKRAJHAR P.O. KOKRAJHAR DISTRICT KOKRAJHAR BTAD ASSAM PIN-783370 Page No.# 3/3 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. M.A. Sheikh, Advocate Advocate for the respondent(s): Mr. B.C. Mushahary, SC, BTC Mr. A. Banerjee, SC, WPT&BC; Ms. M. Kataki, SC AH&V Dept B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 05.10.2026 This is an application filed by the petitioners seeking modification of the order dated 12.08.2026 passed in WP(C) 3543/2025 on the ground that this Court observed that the petitioner had not shown any urgency in the matter as no affidavit-in-reply was filed to the affidavit- in-opposition filed on 16.09.2025. 2. This Court had taken note of the records and from the perusal of the records, it is seen that the affidavit-in-reply was filed on 19.11.2025. 3. Considering the above, the observation made in the order dated 12.08.2025 stands expunged. 2. The Interlocutory Application is allowed to the extent observed above. JUDGE Comparing Assistant