1 2026:CGHC:2823 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 583 of 2026 Dorilal Yadav S/o Lt. Pardeshi Yadav Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Kirari, Ward No. 03, P.S. - Malkharauda, District Sakti (C.G.) ... Applicant(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Police Station - Baramkela, District Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Applicant(s) : Mr. Ankit Singh, Advocate. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sameeksha Gupta, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 16/01/2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 134/2025 registered at Police Station Baramkela, District Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act. 2 2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that on 09.10.2025, as per secret information received form the informant the Police concerned of Police Station seized 8.320 Kgs of contraband article i.e. ganja from an abandoned car bearing registration No.CG-13-AE-3695 and during the course of investigation, owner of the vehicle (present applicant) has been arrested and has admitted the offence in his memorandum statement, which led to the registration of alleged offence against the applicant. Hence the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case and the contraband Ganja was not seized from the exclusive possession of the applicant. He further submits that that prosecution agency has not followed the provisions under Section 42 of the NDPS Act and not taken search warrant from the superior authority. He also submits that from an abandoned car, whose owner is present applicant, intermediate quantity of the psychotropic substance ganja has been seized, and therefore, it will not attract the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act as the commercial quantity of ganja as prescribed under the schedule is more than 20 kgs and from the said abandoned car of the applicant only 8.320 kg Ganja has been seized. He later submits that the applicant has no criminal antecedent and is in jail since 09.10.2025 and the conclusion of the trial is likely to take quite long time. Therefore, he prays for grant of regular bail to the applicant. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the State/non- applicant would oppose the bail application and submit that the 3 charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court and also endorse the said submission that the applicant has no criminal antecedent. She further submits that from an abandoned car of the applicant contraband article i.e. 8.320 kg of Ganja is seized, therefore, the present applicant is not entitled for grant of bail. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedent and the contraband article i.e. 8.320 kg Ganja recovered from an abandoned car, whose owner is present applicant, is less than the commercial quantity and the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case before the competent Court, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case. 7. Accordingly, the application is allowed. 8. Let the Applicant-Dorilal Yadav, involved in Crime No. 134/2025 registered at Police Station Baramkela, District Sarangarh - Bilaigarh (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20B of NDPS Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in 4 court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) CHIEF JUSTICE Akhil