IN TH 128 Rajinder S ICICI Ban CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU petitioner/ dated 04.02 Divn.), Jag closed by C had been gr incorrect to the petition aforesaid f Officer wa effective o petitioner w dated 04.02 Civil Revision No.2449 of 2026 (O & IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Civil Revision N Date of decision nder Singh Versus I Bank Ltd. and another AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. G.C. Shahpuri, Advocate for the petitioner. HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present revision petit ioner/defendant No.1 seeking setting 04.02.2026 passed by the learned A .), Jagadhri, whereby the evidence o d by Court order on the ground that een granted to the petitioner to conclu Learned counsel for the pet rrect to say that five effective opportu etitioner to conclude his evidence. It said five opportunities, on two da er was on leave and, therefore, the tive opportunities. Learned counsel ioner would suffer irreparable loss in 04.02.2026 passed by the learned A O & M) 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ion No.2449 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-16.03.2026 …..Petitioner …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ocate petition has been filed by tting aside of the impugned order rned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. ence of the petitioner has been d that five effective opportunities conclude his evidence. he petitioner submits that it is pportunities had been granted to ce. It is submitted that out of the o dates the learned Presiding e, the same cannot be treated as ounsel further submits that the loss in case the impugned order rned Additional Civil Judge (Sr. VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Divn.), Jag through M outset, lear one effectiv even subjec of notice o result in fur as well as t the presen 04.02.2026 effective o subject to No.1/petitio date of hea March 16 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo Civil Revision No.2449 of 2026 (O & .), Jagadhri in case CS/807/2022 ti gh Manager vs. Rajinder Singh” is t, learned counsel submits that the pet effective opportunity is granted to him subject to payment of reasonable costs After hearing learned counsel tice of motion is dispensed with at t n further delay in disposal of the cas Keeping in view the facts and ell as the submissions made by learned present petition is allowed and th 2.2026 is set aside. The learned trial Co tive opportunity to the petitioner t ct to payment of costs of Rs.15,000 /petitioner to the plaintiff/respondent of hearing before the learned trial Cou Disposed of in the above terms Pending application(s), if any, 6, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No O & M) 2 022 titled as “ICICI Bank Ltd. h” is not set aside. At the very he petitioner would be satisfied if to him to conclude his evidence, le costs. unsel for the petitioner, issuance ith at this stage as it would only he case. cts and circumstances of the case learned counsel for the petitioner, and the impugned order dated trial Court is directed to grant one oner to conclude his evidence, 5,000/- to be paid by defendant ndent No.1 on or before the next al Court. e terms. if any, also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document