ANUSHKA SONWAL D/O SURESH SONWAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1612/2026 · 2026-02-02
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15702 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15702 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4757] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1612/2026 Anushka Sonwal D/o Suresh Sonwal, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Kundanpura, Near Indira Gandhi Nagar, Sector-1, Jagatpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur
2. The Director General Of Police (Recruitment), Police Headquarter, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. The Additional Director General Of Police, Recruitment And Promotion Board, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
4. The Additional Director General Of Police, Cyber Crime And Technical Services, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
5. The Superintendent Of Police (First), Police Telecommunication, Rajasthan, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 02/02/2026
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner secured appropriate position in merit in the Constable Police Telecommunication Operator vide Advertisement dated 09.04.2025 issued under the provisions of Rajasthan Police Subordinate Service Rules, 1989. It is stated that the petitioner belongs to SC Female Category and she possesses all the requisite qualifications for the aforesaid post of Constable Police
[2026:RJ-JP:4757] (2 of 3) [CW-1612/2026] Telecommuniation Operator. The petitioner submitted online application form under SC Female Category yet she has been disqualified during Physical Measurement Report, where her height has been shown as 43.30 kg., whereas the required weight was fixed as 47.5 kg, which is the minimum requirement as per the Rules. Learned counsel submits that after declaring the petitioner ineligible on 05.12.2025. She has secured one health certificate issued by the concerned Medical Officer In-charge, Government Hospoital, Jhalana, Doongri, Jaipur, where her weight has been shown as 48 kg.
2.
Learned counsel submits that in the light of variance between the weight measured by two different Authorities, she may be granted liberty to get his weight measured by the medical experts of AIIMS, Jaipur and on the basis of such result of re- medical examination by the experts of AIIMS, Jaipur, the Competent Authority may be directed to take further actions.
3. Although, in the matters of disputed question of facts, such as variance in weight of incumbent, this Court generally does not accept the writ petition; however, only in the light of the fact that after 9 days from the date of declaring the petitioner as ineligible on account of weight, another Medical Officer has certified that the petitioner is securing the prescribed weight, this Court grants liberty to the petitioner to get herself examined for the purpose of ascertaining her weight by the experts of AIIMS, Jodhpur. In case, the petitioner submits an application within a period of 7 days along with the demand draft of Rs.10,000/- in favour of Superintendent of AIIMS, Jodhpur, then Superintendent of AIIMS, Jodhpur, shall constitute a Medical Board for examining
[2026:RJ-JP:4757] (3 of 3) [CW-1612/2026] weight of the petitioner within a period of 7 days. Thereafter, in case, the medical experts of AIIMS, Jodhpur, certifies that the petitioner is possessing weight of 48 kg. or more, on the basis of such report, the petitioner shall make a representation before the respondents, who shall consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case.
5. The Writ Petition filed by the petitioner stands disposed of.
6. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/44