SHAGUFTA NAZ D/O SH. ABDUL RAUF AND W/O SH. PARVEZ MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CCP/91/2025 · 2026-01-23
Anand Sharma
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15700 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15700 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3299] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 91/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3699/2024 Shagufta Naz D/o Sh. Abdul Rauf And W/o Sh. Parvez Mohammad, Aged About 25 Years, R/o 121, Akashwani, Kota. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Through Its Principal Secretary.
2. Sh. Jagdish Soni, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kota.
3. Mr. Jayendra Singh Solanki, Manager M/s Alfa Ex-Soldier Cooperative Society Lts., Hada Sadan Shivpura, Kota.
4. Smt. Meena Nama Manager M/s Kartikay Education And Training Institute, H.No. 124, Grand Hotel Street Rampura, Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Tanvisha Pant for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG Mr. Yash Joshi, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 23/01/2026
1. The petitioner has filed the present contempt petition alleging non-compliance of order dated 22.03.2024, which was an ex parte interim order where the contention of the petitioner was that the petitioner was engaged through placement agency- respondent No.3 namely M/s Alfa Ex-Soldier Multipurpose Co-
[2026:RJ-JP:3299] (2 of 2) [CCP-91/2025] operative Society Ltd. on the post of Staff Nurse and was posted at Janta Clinic Kailashpuri, Kota.
2. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondents submit that in compliance of order dated 22.03.2024, M/s Alfa Ex-Soldier Multipurpose Co-operative Society Ltd. has passed the order dated 29.03.2024 whereby, the petitioner was reinstated at her earlier post of Staff Nurse at Janta Clinic Kailashpuri, Kota.
4. However, later on contract of aforesaid placement agency has been replaced by another contract and now placement agency has been changed.
5. In the light of above, no case of willful and deliberate defiance is made out and more particularly, nobody is there to press the contempt petition.
6. Hence, the contempt petition filed by the petitioner is, hereby, dismissed.
7. Notices stand discharged.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/8