Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15699 (GAU)

MRS NAYAN MONI BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3132/2026 · 2026-10-04

Shamima Jahan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010220032026 2026:GAU-AS:14832 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3132/2026 MRS NAYAN MONI BEGUM W/O - TAIZUDDIN ALI, RESIDENT OF VILL UDIANA, P.O AND P.S. RANGIA, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN 781354. PETITIONER WAS ARRESTED ON 26.08.2026 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE P.P ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KALITA, MR. J HATIMURIA,MR. N M DAS,H BORUAH Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHAMIMA JAHAN ORDER Date : 05.10.2026 Heard Mr. M. Kalita, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Sarma, the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. By this application the petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Rangia, P.S. Case NO. 283/2026, registered under Sections 143/145 of the BNS, Page No.# 2/3 2023. 3. The FIR in connection with which the petitioner was arrested on 26.08.2026, was lodged by one, Prakash Bora, stating inter alia, that 6 (six) days ago from the date of lodging of the ejahar, an unknown person took him from the railway station to one, Taizuddin’s house and that, he found that a number of boys and girls were kept and confined in the said house with the intention of selling them to other states. The informant further stated that, the police came and rescued 10 males and 2 females from the said house. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, there are no specific allegations against the petitioner in the said FIR and Mr. B. Sarma, the learned APP for the State, submits that, the offence alleged is very serious, although, no specific allegation is made against the petitioner. 5. Upon consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsels, more so in view of the fact, that the petitioner was inside the jail for the last 39 day and also that, no specific allegation is made against her together with the benefit given to a women under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023, this court enlarges the petitioner on bail on furnishing of a bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with one local surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the SDJM, Rangia, Assam under the following conditions : (i) The petitioner shall positively appear before the I.O. and the Trial Court as and when call for. (ii) The petitioner shall not hamper and tamper with the evidence of the case, and/or influence the witness connected with the case; Page No.# 3/3 and (iii) The petitioner shall not leave their residence without prior permission of the Investigating Officer. 6. The Bail Applications stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant