ANUJ SHARMA S/O MAHAVEER PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/951/2026 · 2026-01-31
Ganesh Ram Meena
Public Interest Litigationbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15693 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 15693 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:4544] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 951/2026 Anuj Sharma S/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Pi- lod, P.S. Pilani, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (Accused In Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Nidhi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, Public Prosecutor HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No.327/2025 registered at Police Station Pilani, District Jhun- jhunu for the offences under Sections 103(1), 55, 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Section 3/25 Arms Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the ac- cused-petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and so also perused the case diary. 4. The present criminal case has been registered on the basis of the statement of one Himanshu who was arrested in a criminal case bearing FIR No.320/2025. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is of abatement and criminal conspiracy for committing murder of one Dr. Arti Sharma and the said act of the
[2026:RJ-JP:4544] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-951/2026] accused-petitioner is punishable under Sections 103(1), 55 & 61(2)(a) of BNS, 2023. 5. On perusal of the case diary, it is revealed that no actual murder has been committed however, the allegation is of abatement and conspiracy. 6. It is also submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the other co-accused in this case have already been enlarged on bail and the present accused-petitioner is in custody since 03.12.2025 and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. 7. Having regard to the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of abatement and conspiracy, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 8.
Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /11