Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15692 (DEL)

RAJNI MAKHIJA & ANR. v. ABYDOS INFRA INDIA LIMITED AND OTHERS

CS(OS)/103/2026 · 2026-08-13

Tushar Rao Gedela

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CS(OS) 103/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010040252026 + CS(OS) 103/2026, I.A. 3156/2026, I.A. 6511/2026, I.A. 6548/2026, I.A. 16124/2026 & I.A. 21860/2026 RAJNI MAKHIJA & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Saubhagya Chauriha and Mr. Karan Deep Singh, Advocates. versus ABYDOS INFRA INDIA LIMITED AND OTHERS ....Defendants Through: Mr. Akash Mohan Srivastav, Mr. Nandial Singh and Ms. Rajnandani Singh, Advocates for D-1 and 2. Mr. Sameer Vashisht and Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Advocates for D-3 and 4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 13.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the parties state that the inter se disputes have been amicably settled under the aegis of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. 2. The terms of settlement have been recorded in writing vide the settlement agreement dated 08.07.2026. 3. The terms of settlement have been enumerated in para (i) to (xxvi). It has been brought to the notice of this Court that after the s.no (xxviii) on page 13, the next clause instead of being numbered at (xxix), has erroneously been numbered as (xix) and further the error has continued till the last clause (xxvi). 4. The Registry shall take note of the aforesaid error and treat it as if they are in continuation. 5. It is stated that in terms of para (xi) of the settlement agreement, the defendant nos.1 and 2 had undertaken to deposit a total sum of Rs.53,50,000/- into the “Dedicated Bank Account” towards completion of the construction of This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:30:47 CS(OS) 103/2026 Page 2 of 2 the CC Colony property. 6. It was further agreed that the said sum would be deposited by way of two transactions of Rs.33,00,000/- and Rs.20,50,000/-. It is not disputed that the first transaction of Rs.33 lakhs has already been deposited. The said statement has been affirmed by the learned counsel for the plaintiff. 7. So far as the second transaction of Rs.20,50,000/- is concerned, learned counsel for the defendant no.1 states that an application seeking extension of time for four weeks is prayed. The request is acceded to. 8. The time of payment of the second transaction of Rs.20,50,000/- which expired on 10.08.2026, is extended to a further period of four weeks with effect from 10.08.2026. The defendant shall file an affidavit of undertaking/compliance within one week after the expiry of four weeks. An advance copy thereof shall be furnished to the learned counsel for the plaintiff as also to the defendant no.3. 9. Apart from the above, in terms of the clauses enumerated in the settlement agreement dated 08.07.2026, the respective parties shall file their respective affidavits of compliance within two weeks from the various dates of compliances as recorded in the settlement agreement. 10. In view of the above, the settlement agreement dated 08.07.2026 is taken on record alongwith all the annexures appended thereto. 11. There is no impediment in decreeing and disposing of the suit. 12. Let a decree sheet be drawn up in terms of the settlement agreement dated 08.07.2026 as modified and noted above. 13. The suit is disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 08.07.2026 alongwith all the pending applications, if any. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J AUGUST 13, 2026/yrj This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/08/2026 at 11:30:47