Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15692 (ALL)

RAJNARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIB/3257/2026 · 2026-10-06

Ashutosh Srivastava

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3257 of 2026 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. After some argument learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the purpose of filing of the writ petition would stand sub served if directions are issued to the respondent no. 4 i.e. Consolidation Officer-II, Bhatpar Rani, Deoria, to decide the objections registered as Case No. 326/1100 and 1100 of 2020-21 (Raj Narayan and another vs. Anand Mohan), dated 26.10.2020, under Section 9A(2) of UPCH Act, pending before him, within the time frame fixed by this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the objections are pending consideration since long and the purpose of filing the present petition would stand served if appropriate directions are issued to the respondent No. 4 to consider and decide the aforesaid objection. 4. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid proposition. 5. Considering the totality of the circumstances and submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would stand sub served if directions are issued for expeditious disposal of objection. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed off with a direction to the respondent no. 4 i.e. Consolidation Officer-II, Bhatpar Rani, Deoria, to decide the objection which was registered as Case No. 326 and 1100 of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gyanendra Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajnarayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) 2020-21 (Raj Narayan and another vs. Anand Mohan), dated 26.10.2020, under Section 9A(2) of UPCH Act, on merits, strictly in accordance with law, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of service of certified copy of the order of this Court. October 7, 2026 v.k. updh. WRIB No. 3257 of 2026 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad