Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 15690 (RAJ)

NARESH GURJAR S/O FORU LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/874/2026 · 2026-01-23

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3239] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 874/2026 Naresh Gurjar S/o Foru Lal, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Teekhabada Dist. Bundi (Rajatshan) (At Present Petitioner Confined In Dist. Jail Bundi). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Bajaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. with Mr. Ramesh Kaviya, Police Inspector, Anantpura, Kota City HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 23/01/2026 1. The accused-petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.504/2025 registered with the Police Station Sadar Bundi, District Bundi for offence under Sections 303(2) of B.N.S. and Sections 4 & 21 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. As per the F.I.R., the allegation against the accused-petitioner is of transportation of bajri. He further submits that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2025 and nothing has to be recovered from him. He also submits that the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused-petitioner may be enlarged on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:3239] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-874/2026] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material made available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner and so also the fact that the accused petitioner is in custody since 17.12.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /135